Skip to main content
Article
Civil Rights and Systemic Wrongs
Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law (2011)
  • Melissa Hart, University of Colorado at Boulder
Abstract
Systemic employment discrimination is a structural, social harm whose victims include not only those who can be specifically identified, but also many who cannot. Pattern and practice claims in employment litigation are an essential tool for challenging this structural harm. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart v. Dukes brushes aside the systemic nature of the plaintiffs’ claims, making both theoretical and doctrinal mistakes in its application of the procedural and substantive law applicable in employment discrimination class action litigation. The most troubling part of the Court’s opinion—its rejection of statistical modeling for remedial determinations—has received little attention. This article critiques the Court’s novel and careless interpretation of Title VII and explains the threat the opinion poses to the continued viability of pattern and practice claims.
Keywords
  • Wal-Mart,
  • class actions,
  • Rule 23,
  • Supreme Court,
  • employment discrimination
Publication Date
2011
Citation Information
Melissa Hart, "Civil Rights and Systemic Wrongs," 32 Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law 455 (2011).