Skip to main content
Article
Clinician awareness of adherence to hypertension guidelines
Meyers Primary Care Institute Publications and Presentations
  • Michael A. Steinman, University of California
  • Melissa A. Fischer, University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • Michael G. Shlipak, University of California
  • Hayden B. Bosworth, Duke University
  • Eugene Z. Oddone, Duke University
  • Brian B. Hoffman, Harvard Medical School
  • Mary K. Goldstein, Stanford University
UMMS Affiliation
Department of Medicine
Date
11-16-2004
Document Type
Article
Medical Subject Headings
Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Female; *Guideline Adherence; Humans; Hypertension; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Physician's Practice Patterns; *Practice Guidelines as Topic; Questionnaires; United States; Veterans
Abstract
PURPOSE: Little is known about how well clinicians are aware of their own adherence to clinical guidelines, an important indicator of quality. We compared clinicians' beliefs about their adherence to hypertension guidelines with data on their actual performance. METHODS: We surveyed 139 primary care clinicians at three Veterans Affairs medical centers, asking them to assess their own adherence to hypertension guidelines. We then extracted data from the centers' clinical databases on guideline-concordant medication use and blood pressure control for patients cared for by these providers during a 6-month period. Data were collected for patients with hypertension and diabetes, hypertension and coronary disease, or hypertension with neither of these comorbid conditions. RESULTS: Eighty-six clinicians (62%) completed the survey. Each clinician saw a median of 94 patients with hypertension (mean age, 65 years). Patients were treated with an average of 1.6 antihypertensive medications. Overall, clinicians overestimated the proportion of their patients who were prescribed guideline-concordant medications (75% perceived vs. 67% actual, P <0.001) and who had blood pressure levels <140/90 mm Hg on their last visit (68% perceived vs. 43% actual, P <0.001). Among individual clinicians, there were no significant correlations between perceived and actual guideline adherence (r = 0.18 for medications, r = 0.14 for blood pressure control; P > or =0.10 for both). Clinicians with relatively low actual guideline performance were most likely to overestimate their adherence to medication recommendations and blood pressure targets. CONCLUSION: Clinicians appear to overestimate their adherence to hypertension guidelines, particularly with regards to the proportion of their patients with controlled blood pressure. This limited awareness may represent a barrier to successful implementation of guidelines, and could be addressed through the use of provider profiles and point-of-service feedback to clinicians.
Rights and Permissions
Citation: Am J Med. 2004 Nov 15;117(10):747-54. Link to article on publisher's site
Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMed
PubMed ID
15541324
Citation Information
Michael A. Steinman, Melissa A. Fischer, Michael G. Shlipak, Hayden B. Bosworth, et al.. "Clinician awareness of adherence to hypertension guidelines" Vol. 117 Iss. 10 (2004) ISSN: 0002-9343 (Linking)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/melissa_fischer/6/