Skip to main content
Article
Between two worlds: a multi-institutional qualitative analysis of students' reflections on joining the medical profession.
Meyers Primary Care Institute Publications and Presentations
  • Melissa A. Fischer, University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • Heather E. Harrell, University of Florida
  • Heather-Lyn Haley, University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • Adam S. Cifu, University of Chicago
  • Eric J. Alper, University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • Krista M. Johnson, University of Chicago
  • David S. Hatem, University of Massachusetts Medical School
UMMS Affiliation
Meyers Primary Care Institute; Department of Family Medicine and Community Health; Department of Medicine
Date
7-1-2008
Document Type
Article
Medical Subject Headings
Career Choice; Clinical Clerkship; Humans; Internal Medicine; Students, Medical; Writing
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent changes in healthcare system and training mandates have altered the clinical learning environment. We incorporated reflective writing into Internal Medicine clerkships (IMcs) in multiple institutions so students could consider the impact of clerkship experiences on their personal and professional development. We analyzed student reflections to inform curricula and support learning. METHODS: We qualitatively analyzed the reflections of students at 3 US medical schools during IMcs (N = 292) to identify themes, tone, and reflective quality using an iterative approach. Chi-square tests assessed differences between these factors and across institutions. FINDINGS: Students openly described powerful experiences. Major themes focused on 4 categories: personal issues (PI), professional development (PD), relational issues (RI), and medical care (MC). Each major theme was represented at each institution, although with significant variability between institutions in many of the subcategories including student role (PI), development-as-a-physician (PD), professionalism (PD) (p < 0.001). Students used positive tones to describe student role, development-as-a-physician and physician-patient relationship (PD) (p < 0.01-0.001), and negative tones for quality and safety (MC) (p < 0.05). Only 4% of writings coded as professionalism had a positive tone. Students employed a "reporting" voice in writing about clinical problem-solving, healthcare systems, and quality/safety (MC). DISCUSSION: Reflection is considered important to professional development. Our analysis suggests that students at 3 institutions reflect on similar experiences. Theme variability across institutions implies curricula should be tailored to local culture. Reflective quality analysis suggests students are better equipped to reflect on certain experiences over others, which may impact learning. Student reflections can function as a mirror for our organizations, offer institutional feedback for support and improvement, and inform curricula for learners and faculty.
Rights and Permissions
Citation: J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jul;23(7):958-63. Link to article on publisher's website
Related Resources
Link to article in PubMed
PubMed ID
18612724
Citation Information
Melissa A. Fischer, Heather E. Harrell, Heather-Lyn Haley, Adam S. Cifu, et al.. "Between two worlds: a multi-institutional qualitative analysis of students' reflections on joining the medical profession." Vol. 23 Iss. 7 (2008) ISSN: 1525-1497
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/melissa_fischer/1/