Skip to main content
Contribution to Book
On the Differences Between Ma’atian Communicative Solidarity and the Socratic Dialectic
The Routledge Handbook of Comparative World Rhetorics Studies in the History, Application, and Teaching of Rhetoric Beyond Traditional Greco-Roman Contexts (2020)
  • Melba Vélez Ortiz
Abstract
For Egyptologists like Jan Assmann, “the art of hearing is the great theme in Egyptian anthropology.” Perhaps, no other text makes this characterization more evident than The Maxims of Ptahhotep; a constitutive document in the Egyptian Wisdom literature written around 2350 BCE, and often touted as the oldest book in the world. Among the pieces of wisdom found in this text is the curious and important: "to listen is better than anything, thus is born perfect love." This chapter will present a conceptual analysis of the qualitative differences between a Maatian listening-centered view of communication excellence versus the classical speaker-center ancient Greek view of dialogue. Consequently, the chapter will treat the concept of communication as a corollary of the concept of love. The picture that emerges is one in which the “erotic” character of love advanced by Socrates in the Phaedrus in which communication aims to teach and express with fidelity and without distortion, stands in contrast to the Ma'atian guiding principle of “communicative solidarity,” a listening centered communication ethic premised on three principles 1) active solidarity (reciprocity); 2) communicative solidarity (shared moral language); and 3) intentional solidarity (prescriptive altruism). In short, Maat is about becoming lovable, crucially, to oneself.
 
Keywords
  • Maat,
  • Kemet,
  • ethics
Publication Date
Summer July 5, 2020
Editor
Keith Lloyd
Publisher
Routledge
ISBN
9780367409029
Citation Information
Melba Vélez Ortiz. "On the Differences Between Ma’atian Communicative Solidarity and the Socratic Dialectic" LondonThe Routledge Handbook of Comparative World Rhetorics Studies in the History, Application, and Teaching of Rhetoric Beyond Traditional Greco-Roman Contexts (2020)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/melbavelezortiz/18/
Creative Commons License
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons CC_BY International License.