Skip to main content
Unpublished Paper
Permissiveness toward illegal actions in Uruguay Are Belief in God, income and education relevant?
dECON - Serie Documentos de Trabajo (2009)
  • Maximo Rossi
  • Natalia Melgar
Abstract

This paper assesses the willingness to justify illegal actions and whether this attitude has changed between 1995 and 2005. Our dataset are 1995 and 2005 waves of World Values Survey. Permissiveness or the willingness to justify illegal actions is a cultural phenomenon that can be defined in several ways depending on societies and people. Hence, we consider firstly the four dimensions available (accepting bribes, evading taxes, etc.), and we estimated multivariate regressions. Secondly, from principal component analysis, we generated a new variable "willingness to justify” as a weighted average of the previous dimensions. We find that socio-demographic variables such as age and education reduce permissiveness, political affiliation with the Center hikes it, being employed full time reduces permissiveness while income has the opposite effect, even when religiosity reduces permissiveness, beliefs in God do not matter, living in Montevideo reduces permissiveness and finally, between 1995 and 2005 the permissiveness among Uruguayans has changed, the model show that the probability of being permissive is significantly higher in 2005 than in 1995

Keywords
  • permissiveness,
  • illegal action,
  • microeconomic behavior,
  • Uruguay
Disciplines
Publication Date
July, 2009
Citation Information
Maximo Rossi and Natalia Melgar. "Permissiveness toward illegal actions in Uruguay Are Belief in God, income and education relevant?" dECON - Serie Documentos de Trabajo (2009)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/maximo_rossi/44/