![](https://d3ilqtpdwi981i.cloudfront.net/UleF_X6nTQixACbYhCKyytd7SLA=/425x550/smart/https://bepress-attached-resources.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/ad/31/bf/ad31bf63-3e9f-4159-be4b-23cb361ea992/thumbnail_5326785b-e1f9-4823-97d7-f1f3ee443e47.jpg)
Americans are taking new interest in legal reasoning. Thinking Like a Lawyer: A New Introduction to Legal Reasoning by Professor Frederick Schauer suggests why. According to Schauer, American legal methods often require decision-makers “to do something other than the right thing.” There has got to be a better way. Now comes a book that offers Americans opportunities to look into a world where legal methods help decision-makers do the right thing. According to Reinhard Zippelius in his newly translated Introduction to German Legal Methods, German legal methods help decision makers resolve legal problems “in a just and equitable manner.” This Article sets out what good legal methods do: help decide legal problems justly. It poses the puzzle: why does Schauer say legal methods challenge rather than support doing the right thing, when Zippelius does not? Relying on Schauer himself, the Article suggests an answer: neglect of legislation and law application and fixation on appellate law-making. It shows how German legal methods as described by Zippelius help decision makers to do the right thing.
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/maxeiner/11/