Not so fast, Mr. Pinker: Making the case for human nurtureAnnual Meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis
Document TypeConference Presentation
OrganizationAssociation for Behavior Analysis
Conference DatesMay 26-30, 2006
Date of Presentation5-28-2006
AbstractSteven Pinker has argued that 1) the prevailing "theory of human nature" held by intellectuals in our culture is "the idea that the human mind has no inherent structure and can be inscribed at will by society or ourselves"--the so-called Blank Slate theory; 2) there is a corresponding denial of human nature; and 3) modern cognitive neuroscience and evolutionry psychology together are convincingly challenging the Blank Slate position. In the paper, we 1) describe this Blank Slate position as straw person; 2)argue that there is a modern denial (or ignorance) of learning, not inheritance; and then 3) describe some of the evidence against an evolutionary psychology account of human nature and in favor of a learning account, acknowledging that the development of behavior always results from the constant interaction between genes (evolution) and environment (learning).
Citation InformationHenry Schlinger and Matthew P. Normand. "Not so fast, Mr. Pinker: Making the case for human nurture" Annual Meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis (2006)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/matthew-normand/109/