![](https://d3ilqtpdwi981i.cloudfront.net/JinY8o0fGpxVe68y6RezELncg0w=/425x550/smart/https://bepress-attached-resources.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/40/e1/da/40e1da35-a57b-4cbd-9e39-70a6ad258142/thumbnail_0abfeaf7-954b-409f-aba1-6126dcece262.jpg)
Article
Balancing Federal Court Intervention with State Sovereignty
Faculty Publications and Presentations
Publication Date
1-1-1997
Disciplines
Comments
Published in 22 Oklahoma City University Law Review 1143 (1997).
Abstract
Mathew D. Staver writes about the Abstention Doctrine. The Article provides an analysis of the Anti-Injunction Act and the applicability of the Pullman, Younger, Rooker-Feldman, Brillhart, and Colorado River Abstention Doctrines, paying particular attention to how each doctrine affects a litigator's practice.
Citation Information
Mathew D. Staver. "Balancing Federal Court Intervention with State Sovereignty" (1997) Available at: http://works.bepress.com/mathew_staver/10/