Skip to main content
The international criminal court - What it means to Australia.
Law Faculty Publications
  • Mary E Hiscock, Bond University
Date of this Version
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Details
Hiscock, Mary (2002), The international criminal court - What it means to Australia. The National Legal Eagle, September 2002, pp. 11-13.

Copyright ©The Law Society of New South Wales, 2001.

Reproduced with permission.
Extract: For several hundred years, it has been a basic rule of our legal system that "all crime is local". For another country to seek to punish conduct not performed within its borders has been seen as an unacceptable attempt to undermine the sovereignty and authority of the country of residence of the person accused. The era of colonial power was perhaps an exception to this, but one justified on the basis that the colonial power included all its empire within its own territory. It was not always so. When the Christian Church held sway across Europe, the canon law was supranational, and breaches of canon law were tried in Church courts, and subject to appeal outside the country of origin. Much of our modern criminal procedure came from church law. But the Reformation in the 16th centuly removed the widespread ambit of this kind of international criminal law. The one crime of universal jurisdiction after that was piracy - armed robbery on the high seas. Any country could try - and usually execute - a person accused of piracy. But developments culminating in the this new century have brought in a new era of international criminal law and procedure.
Citation Information
Mary E Hiscock. "The international criminal court - What it means to Australia." (2002)
Available at: