Skip to main content
Article
Identifying strategies to improve access to credible and relevant information for public health professionals: a qualitative study
Library Publications and Presentations
  • Nancy R. LaPelle, University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • Roger S. Luckmann, University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • E. Hatheway Simpson, University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • Elaine Russo Martin, University of Massachusetts Medical School
Date
4-5-2006
Document Type
Article
Medical Subject Headings
Information Services; Access to Information; Needs Assessment; Public Health; Public Health Administration; Public Health Informatics; Qualitative Research
Abstract

Background Movement towards evidence-based practices in many fields suggests that public health (PH) challenges may be better addressed if credible information about health risks and effective PH practices is readily available. However, research has shown that many PH information needs are unmet. In addition to reviewing relevant literature, this study performed a comprehensive review of existing information resources and collected data from two representative PH groups, focusing on identifying current practices, expressed information needs, and ideal systems for information access. Methods Nineteen individual interviews were conducted among employees of two domains in a state health department – communicable disease control and community health promotion. Subsequent focus groups gathered additional data on preferences for methods of information access and delivery as well as information format and content. Qualitative methods were used to identify themes in the interview and focus group transcripts. Results Informants expressed similar needs for improved information access including single portal access with a good search engine; automatic notification regarding newly available information; access to best practice information in many areas of interest that extend beyond biomedical subject matter; improved access to grey literature as well as to more systematic reviews, summaries, and full-text articles; better methods for indexing, filtering, and searching for information; and effective ways to archive information accessed. Informants expressed a preference for improving systems with which they were already familiar such as PubMed and listservs rather than introducing new systems of information organization and delivery. A hypothetical ideal model for information organization and delivery was developed based on informants' stated information needs and preferred means of delivery. Features of the model were endorsed by the subjects who reviewed it. Conclusion Many critical information needs of PH practitioners are not being met efficiently or at all. We propose a dual strategy of: 1) promoting incremental improvements in existing information delivery systems based on the expressed preferences of the PH users of the systems and 2) the concurrent development and rigorous evaluation of new models of information organization and delivery that draw on successful resources already operating to deliver information to clinical medical practitioners.

Rights and Permissions
First published in BMC Public Health, 5(6): 89, 2006, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-89, an open-access journal.
Related Resources
Link to article in PubMed. See also the project website: Evidence-Based Practice for Public Health.
PubMed ID
16597331
Citation Information
Nancy R. LaPelle, Roger S. Luckmann, E. Hatheway Simpson and Elaine Russo Martin. "Identifying strategies to improve access to credible and relevant information for public health professionals: a qualitative study" (2006)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/martine/22/