Skip to main content
Article
The social implications of planning: How public predictions bias future plans
Faculty Publications
  • Stephanie Pezzo
  • Mark V. Pezzo
  • Eric R. Stone
SelectedWorks Author Profiles:

Mark Pezzo

Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2006
Date Issued
January 2006
Date Available
July 2011
Disciplines
Abstract

The planning fallacy, or tendency to underestimate how long a task will take to complete, is a robust phenomenon. Although several explanations have been offered (e.g., ignoring underestimations made in the past), we hypothesized that self-presentation concerns may also contribute to the bias, and that this effect may be exacerbated by a previous failure to complete a task on time. Half of our sample (nD85) were led to believe that they failed to complete an initial task on time, and half were not. Predictions were then made for time to complete a second task either verbally to a familiar experimenter (high self-presentation) or anonymously (low self-presentation). Although verbal predictions exhibited the typical planning fallacy, anonymous predictions did not. Additionally, verbal predictions were less accurate, that is, less correlated with actual completion times, than were anonymous predictions. There was no significant difference in the bias as a result of the failure manipulation, nor was there an interaction between the self-presentation and failure conditions.

Comments
Abstract only. Full-text article is available only through licensed access provided by the publisher. Published in Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42 (2), 221-227 (2006). Members of the USF System may access the full-text of the article through the authenticated link provided.
Language
en_US
Publisher
Academic Press
Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
Citation Information
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42 (2), 221-227 (2006)