Skip to main content
Performance comparison of evolutionary algorithms for airfoil design
Procedia Computer Science
  • Marcus Randall, Bond University
  • Tim Rawlins, Griffith University
  • Andrew Lewis, Griffith University
  • Timoleon Kipouros, University of Cambridge
Date of this Version
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Details

Published version

Randall, M., Rawlins, T., Lewis. A., & Kipouros, T. (2015). Performance comparison of evolutionary algorithms for airfoil design. Procedia Computer Science, 51, 2267-2276.

Access the journal

Copyright © The Authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Licence

2015 HERDC submission

Different evolutionary algorithms, by their very nature, will have different search trajectory characteristics. Understanding these particularly for real world problems gives researchers and practitioners valuable insights into potential problem domains for the various algorithms, as well as an understanding for potential hybridisation. In this study, we examine three evolutionary techniques, namely, multi-objective particle swarm optimisation, extremal optimisation and tabu search. A problem that is to design optimal cross sectional areas of airfoils that maximise lift and minimise drag, is used. The comparison analyses actual parameter values, rather than just objective function values and computational costs. It reveals that the three algorithms had distinctive search patterns, and favoured different regions during exploration of the design space.
Citation Information
Marcus Randall, Tim Rawlins, Andrew Lewis and Timoleon Kipouros. "Performance comparison of evolutionary algorithms for airfoil design" Procedia Computer Science Vol. 51 (2015) p. 2267 - 2276 ISSN: 1877-0509
Available at: