Skip to main content
Article
Brothers in alms? Coordination between nonprofits on markets for donations
Journal of Public Economics (2014)
  • Gani Aldashev, ECARES
  • Marco Marini
  • Thierry Verdier, Paris School of Economics
Abstract
Mission-driven nonprofit organizations compete for donations through fundraising activities. Such competition can lead to inefficient outcomes, if nonprofits impose externalities on each others' output. This paper studies the sustainability of fundraising coordination agreements, using a game-theoretic model of coalition formation. We show that three key characteristics determine the stability of cooperation between nonprofits: (i) the alliance formation rule, (ii) the extent to which fundraising efforts are strategic complements/substitutes, and (iii) whether deviation from the agreements is by an individual or by a group of nonprofits. We analyze how the interaction of these three features induces (or not) the stability of Pareto-optimal full coordination in fundraising.
Keywords
  • NGO,
  • Coordination
Publication Date
Summer June 2, 2014
DOI
10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.04.009
Citation Information
Gani Aldashev, Marco Marini and Thierry Verdier. "Brothers in alms? Coordination between nonprofits on markets for donations" Journal of Public Economics Vol. 117 Iss. 1 (2014) p. 182 - 2000
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/marco_marini/6/