Skip to main content
Article
Refuges and Risks: Evaluating the Benefits of an Expanded MPA Network for Mobile Apex Predators
Diversity and Distributions
  • Ryan Daly, Port Elizabeth Museum at Bayworld - South Africa; Save Our Seas Foundation - Geneva, Switzerland
  • Malcolm J. Smale, Port Elizabeth Museum at Bayworld - South Africa; Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University - Port Elizabeth, South Africa
  • Sarika Singh, Deparment of Environmental Affairs - Cape Town, South Africa
  • Mahmood S. Shivji, Nova Southeastern University
  • Clare A. K. Daly, Save Our Seas Foundation - Geneva, Switzerland
  • James S. E. Lea, University of Oxford - Tubney, United Kingdom; Marine Research Facility - Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Lara L. Sousa, University of Oxford - Tubney, United Kingdom
  • Bradley M. Wetherbee, Nova Southeastern University; University of Rhode Island
  • Richard Fitzpatrick, James Cook University - Cairns, Australia
  • Christopher R. Clarke, Marine Research Facility - Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Marcus Sheaves, James Cook University - Cairns, Australia
  • Adam Barnett, James Cook University - Cairns, Australia
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-25-2018
Keywords
  • Conservation,
  • Marine protected area,
  • Satellite telemetry,
  • Sharks,
  • Top predators
Abstract

Aim: Concurrently, assessing the effectiveness of marine protected areas and evaluating the degree of risk from humans to key species provide valuable information that can be integrated into conservation management planning. Tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) are a wide‐ranging ecologically important species subject to various threats. The aim of this study was to identify “hotspots” of tiger shark habitat use in relation to protected areas and potential risks from fishing. Location

Location: Southwest Indian Ocean, east coast of South Africa and Mozambique.

Methods: Satellite tags were fitted to 26 tiger sharks. A subset of 19 sharks with an average period at liberty of 197 (SD = 110) days were analysed using hotspot analysis to identify areas of core habitat use. The spatial and temporal overlap of significant hotspots with current and planned marine protected areas as well as risks from fishing and culling was then calculated.

Results: There was a 5.97% spatial overlap between tiger shark hotspots and marine protected areas, which would increase significantly (p < .05) to 24.36% with the expansion of planned protected areas in South Africa and could be as high as 41.43% if Mozambique similarly expanded neighbouring protected area boundaries. Tiger sharks remained largely coastal, but only showed a spatial overlap of 5.12% with shark culling nets in South Africa. Only three sharks undertook open ocean migrations during which they were more likely to interact with longline fisheries in the region.

Main conclusions: This study demonstrates how spatial information can be used to assess the overlap between marine protected areas and the core habitats of top marine predators and highlights how congruent transnational conservation management can improve the effectiveness of protected areas. Core habitat use of marine apex predators may also be indicative of productive habitats, and therefore, predators such as tiger sharks could act as surrogate species for identifying key habitats to prioritize for conservation planning.

Comments

©2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

ORCID ID
0000-0002-3753-8950
ResearcherID
G-4080-2013
DOI
10.1111/ddi.12758
Citation Information
Ryan Daly, Malcolm J. Smale, Sarika Singh, Mahmood S. Shivji, et al.. "Refuges and Risks: Evaluating the Benefits of an Expanded MPA Network for Mobile Apex Predators" Diversity and Distributions (2018) p. 1 - 14 ISSN: 1366-9516
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/mahmood-shivji/176/