Skip to main content
Article
Competition in the Chemostat: A Comparison of Inhibitory and Lethal Offensive Strategies
Mathematics and Computers in Simulation
  • Martha L. Abell, Georgia Southern University
  • James P. Braselton, Georgia Southern University
  • Lorraine Braselton, Georgia Southern University
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
7-3-2006
DOI
10.1016/j.matcom.2006.03.001
Disciplines
Abstract

Competing species use a variety of strategies to gain an advantage over a competitor. We show that a desirable auxotrophic mutant can sometimes gain a growth advantage over its parental (or, wild-type) organism by using an offensive inhibitory or lethal strategy against the parental organism that lower’s the parental organism’s growth rate. Our numerical results indicate that inhibitive offensive strategies can stabilize a system while lethal offensive strategies can destabilize a system. Thus, even though a mutant may have a lower growth rate and/or higher metabolic needs than the parental organism, it may gain an advantage over the parental organism if it can limit the parental organism’s growth allowing it to coexist with the parental organism.

Citation Information
Martha L. Abell, James P. Braselton and Lorraine Braselton. "Competition in the Chemostat: A Comparison of Inhibitory and Lethal Offensive Strategies" Mathematics and Computers in Simulation Vol. 72 Iss. 1 (2006) p. 10 - 25 ISSN: 0378-4754
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/lorraine_braselton/4/