Skip to main content
Article
Factors Influencing Perioperative Nurses' Error Reporting Preferences
AORN Journal
  • Sherry Espin, Ryerson University
  • Glenn Regehr, University of Toronto
  • Wendy Levinson, University of Toronto
  • G. Ross Baker, University of Toronto
  • Christina Biancucci, University of Toronto
  • Lorelei Lingard, University of Toronto
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-1-2007
URL with Digital Object Identifier
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-2092(07)60125-2
Abstract
To explore the influence of scope of practice and patient outcomes on error reporting, 13 nurses were interviewed after they reviewed four "error" scenarios ranging in both scope of practice and seriousness of outcome. Of 52 theoretical incidents, only 30 were identified as errors. The nurses indicated they would formally report errors for only eight of the incidents. For another 10 incidents, the nurses would have reported using an informal reporting system only. Qualitative analysis of the interviews revealed that perceived scope of practice influenced reporting preferences, and seriousness of outcome was only a secondary consideration. Selective error reporting and the reasons for selective reporting have negative implications for patient safety.
Notes

Dr. Lorelei Lingard is currently a faculty member at The University of Western Ontario. 

Citation Information
Sherry Espin, Glenn Regehr, Wendy Levinson, G. Ross Baker, et al.. "Factors Influencing Perioperative Nurses' Error Reporting Preferences" AORN Journal Vol. 85 Iss. 3 (2007) p. 527 - 543
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/loreleilingard/76/