Skip to main content
Article
Coping With Powerlessness: The Relationship of Sex and Job Dependency to Empowerment Strategy Usage
Administrative Science Quarterly
  • Lisa A. Mainiero, Fairfield University
Document Type
Article
Article Version
Publisher's PDF
Publication Date
1-1-1986
Disciplines
Abstract

A critical-incident interviewing method was used to determine the strategies employed by men and women in organizational situations. Ninety-eight male and female participants provided an example of a frustrating workplace situation in which they were powerless because they were dependent on others and the action they took in response to the situation. Measures of job dependency, taken as a measure of relative power for each job, were also assessed. Chi-square, correlational, and log-linear results indicated that while men and women did not differ in the relative power of the jobs they held, women tended to use an acquiescence strategy to a greater extent than men in coping with their powerlessness. When examined, relative job dependency, however, had a greater effect than gender on the use of this strategy.

Comments

Copyright 1986 Administrative Science Quarterly

Contents may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.

Published Citation
Mainiero, L.A. 1986. "Coping With Powerlessness: The Relationship of Sex and Job Dependency to Empowerment Strategy Usage". Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(4), 633-653.
Peer Reviewed
Citation Information
Lisa A. Mainiero. "Coping With Powerlessness: The Relationship of Sex and Job Dependency to Empowerment Strategy Usage" Administrative Science Quarterly Vol. 31 Iss. 4 (1986)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/lisa_mainiero/18/