Skip to main content
Article
Do older adults change their eyewitness reports when re-questioned?
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
  • Linda Henkel, Fairfield University
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2013
Abstract

Objectives. This study examined how older adults responded to different types of pressure to change their responses when questioned a second time about their memory for a crime. Method. After watching a video of a crime and answering questions about remembered details, younger (18–22 years) and older adults (64–91 years) were either given negative feedback about their memory performance, were told that most people their age did poorly on the memory test (stereotype threat), or were simply asked to answer the questions again. This was done regardless of their actual accuracy, and the questions were then repeated. Results. Results showed that both younger and older adults changed significantly more responses following negative feedback and changed more responses on misleading than on nonleading questions. Among older adults, as age increased, accuracy decreased and rate of response change increased. People were moderately confident overall about both their correct and incorrect responses. Discussion. These results highlight the dangers of repeatedly questioning older witnesses with misleading questions and suggest that the responses that are changed may come to be remembered confidently—regardless of whether they are correct or incorrect.

Comments

Copyright 2013 Oxford University Press

A link to full text has been provided for authorized users.

Published Citation
Henkel, L. A. (2013). Do older adults change their eyewitness reports when re-questioned?. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(3), 356-365. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt071.
DOI
10.1093/geronb/gbt071
None
Peer Reviewed
Citation Information
Linda Henkel. "Do older adults change their eyewitness reports when re-questioned?" Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences Vol. 69 Iss. 3 (2013)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/linda_henkel/27/