Skip to main content
Article
Drug Treatment Outcome Methodology (1993-1997) Strengths, Weaknesses, and a Comparison to the Alcohol Field.
Addictive Behaviors
  • Timothy P. Ellingstad, University of California - San Diego
  • Linda C. Sobell, Nova Southeastern University
  • Mark B. Sobell, Nova Southeastern University
  • Pamela Planthara, Nova Southeastern University
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-1-2002
Disciplines
Abstract/Excerpt

Although several critiques of the methodology of alcohol treatment outcome studies have been published, similar reviews of the methodology of drug treatment outcome studies are lacking. This paper reviews the methodology of drug treatment outcome studies published from 1993 through 1997 and draws comparisons with the most recent methodological review of alcohol treatment outcome studies. Each drug study was evaluated as to whether the following types of data were reported: (1) demographic, (2) drug use, (3) study characteristics, and (4) outcome and follow-up information. Although results for drug studies showed some areas of strength compared to alcohol studies, in general, the weaknesses were similar to or worse than in the alcohol field, including inadequate reporting of demographic and drug use variables. Weaknesses in follow-up procedures were particularly notable. Suggestions for improving the reporting of methodological and outcome variables for drug treatment outcome studies are discussed.

DOI
10.1016/S0306-4603(01)00261-1
Citation Information
Timothy P. Ellingstad, Linda C. Sobell, Mark B. Sobell and Pamela Planthara. "Drug Treatment Outcome Methodology (1993-1997) Strengths, Weaknesses, and a Comparison to the Alcohol Field." Addictive Behaviors Vol. 27 Iss. 3 (2002) p. 319 - 330 ISSN: 0306-4603
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/linda-sobell/120/