Skip to main content
Article
A Euclid Dissent
Real Estate Law Journal (2019)
  • Michael Lewyn
Abstract
In Euclid v. Ambler Realty, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of zoning, including zoning that excluded apartment houses and retail businesses. Although the decision was not unanimous, the Euclid minority did not write a formal dissent. The purpose of this article is to show what such a dissent should have looked like.
Keywords
  • apartment,
  • zoning,
  • housing,
  • euclid,
  • office,
  • retail,
  • store,
  • exclusionary
Publication Date
Winter 2019
Citation Information
Michael Lewyn. "A Euclid Dissent" Real Estate Law Journal Vol. 48 (2019) p. 372 - 381
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/lewyn/193/