Skip to main content
Article
Preferential partner selection in an evolutionary study of Prisoner's Dilemma
Biosystems
  • Dan Ashlock, Iowa State University
  • Mark Smucker, University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • E. Ann Stanley, Iowa State University
  • Leigh Tesfatsion, Iowa State University
Document Type
Article
Publication Version
Submitted Manuscript
Publication Date
1-1-1996
DOI
10.1016/0303-2647(95)01548-5
Abstract

Partner selection is an important process in many social interactions, permitting individuals to decrease the risks associated with cooperation. In large populations, defectors may escape punishment by roving from partner to partner, but defectors in smaller populations risk social isolation. We investigate these possibilities for an evolutionary Prisoner's Dilemma in which agents use expected payoffs to choose and refuse partners. In comparison to random or round-robin partner matching, we find that the average payoffs attained with preferential partner selection tend to be more narrowly confined to a few isolated payoff regions. Most ecologies evolve to essentially full cooperative behavior, but when agents are intolerant of defections, or when the costs of refusal and social isolation are small, we also see the emergence of wallflower ecologies in which all agents are socially isolated. Between these two extremes, we see the emergence of ecologies whose agents tend to engage in a small number of defections followed by cooperation thereafter. The latter ecologies exhibit a plethora of interesting social interaction patterns.

Comments

This is a working paper of an article from Biosystems 37 (1996): 99, doi:10.1016/0303-2647(95)01548-5.

Citation Information
Dan Ashlock, Mark Smucker, E. Ann Stanley and Leigh Tesfatsion. "Preferential partner selection in an evolutionary study of Prisoner's Dilemma" Biosystems Vol. 37 Iss. 1-2 (1996) p. 99 - 125
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/leigh-tesfatsion/78/