Skip to main content
Article
Representational Competence: Defining the Limits of the Right to Self-Representation at Trial
UF Law Faculty Publications
  • E. Lea Johnston, University of Florida Levin College of Law
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2011
Abstract
In 2008, the Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment permits a trial court to impose a higher competence standard for self-representation than to stand trial. The Court declined to delineate a permissible representational competence standard but indicated that findings of incompetence based on a lack of decisionmaking ability would withstand constitutional scrutiny. To date, no court or commentator has suggested a comprehensive competence standard to address the particular decisional context of self-representation at trial. Conceptualizing self-representation as an exercise in problem solving, this Article draws upon social problem-solving theory to identify abilities necessary for autonomous decisionmaking. The Article develops and applies a normative theory of representational competence to evaluate particular problem-solving abilities in light of competing norms of self-representation. It concludes by proposing a representational competence standard.
Citation Information
E. Lea Johnston, Representational Competence: Defining the Limits of the Right to Self-Representation at Trial, 86 Notre Dame L. Rev. 523 (2011), available at http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/183