Skip to main content
Article
Efficacy of a Computerized Abuse and Safety Assessment Intervention for Women with Disabilities: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Rehabilitation Psychology (2010)
  • Susan Robinson-Whelen
  • Rosemary B. Hughes
  • Laurie E. Powers, Portland State University
  • Mary Oschwald, Portland State University
  • Paula Renker
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of a computerized disability-specific abuse assessment intervention on abuse awareness, safety self-efficacy, and safety promoting behaviors of women with diverse disabilities. Research Design: A randomized control group design was used, with the intervention group completing the assessment intervention both at Time 1 (T1) and 3 months later at Time 2 (T2) and control participants completing it for the first time at T2. Analyses compared intervention and control groups at T2 and evaluated change over time in intervention group participants. The relationship between outcome variables (abuse awareness, safety self-efficacy, safety behaviors) was also explored. Results: The intervention group had greater abuse awareness than the control group at T2, and abuse awareness increased from T1 to T2 among women in the intervention group, particularly among women who had experienced little or no abuse in the past year. Both abuse awareness and safety self-efficacy were significantly related to safety behaviors. Conclusions: The computerized program offers promise as a nonthreatening method of conducting abuse assessments among women with disabilities while also serving as an intervention to enhance abuse awareness.

Keywords
  • Disabled Persons --psychology,
  • Self-efficacy,
  • Intimate Partner violence
Publication Date
May, 2010
Publisher Statement
Copyright (2010) American Psychological Association
Citation Information
Susan Robinson-Whelen, Rosemary B. Hughes, Laurie E. Powers, Mary Oschwald, et al.. "Efficacy of a Computerized Abuse and Safety Assessment Intervention for Women with Disabilities: A Randomized Controlled Trial" Rehabilitation Psychology Vol. 55 Iss. 2 (2010)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/laurie_powers/17/