Skip to main content
Liability Issues in Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Statutes
Systems and Psychosocial Advances Research Center Publications and Presentations
  • Mark A. Small, Clemson University
  • Phillip M. Lyons, Jr., Sam Houston State University
  • Laura S. Guy, University of Massachusetts Medical School
UMMS Affiliation
Department of Psychiatry
Publication Date
Document Type
Child Abuse; Liability, Legal; Mandatory Reporting

For nearly 30 years, psychologists have relied almost exclusively on child abuse and neglect reporting statutes to understand the legal duty to report child maltreatment. Although these statutes go far in delineating the contours of reporting requirements, mandated reporters may further their understandings of their duties through knowledge of judicial interpretation of these statutes. Accordingly, this article reviews the liability provisions found in the 50 states' child abuse and neglect reporting statutes and summarizes relevant court findings. Courts seem motivated by 2 key considerations, namely, that statutes should be interpreted broadly and that states' interests in such reporting is compelling. These opinions offer practical guidance as well as information relevant to the debate on how these reporting statutes should be reformed.

Small, M. A., Lyons, P. M., & Guy, L. S. (2002). Liability issues in child abuse and neglect reporting statutes. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 13-18.
Citation Information
Mark A. Small, Phillip M. Lyons and Laura S. Guy. "Liability Issues in Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Statutes" Vol. 33 Iss. 1 (2002)
Available at: