Skip to main content
Article
Sex Offender Risk Assessment: A Cautionary Note Regarding Measures Attempting to Quantify Violence Risk
Systems and Psychosocial Advances Research Center Publications and Presentations
  • Amy E. Amenta, Sam Houston State University
  • Laura S. Guy, University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • John F. Edens, Southern Methodist University
UMMS Affiliation
Department of Psychiatry
Date
1-1-2003
Document Type
Article
Medical Subject Headings
Sex Offenses; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors
Abstract
In recent years, the field of forensic psychology has witnessed a proliferation of instruments designed to ascertain the degree of risk of sex offenders who may be released into the community and/or who may be subject to civil commitment. Although few would argue against the importance of basing evaluations and recommendations on empirical research, practitioners sometimes draw conclusions that go well beyond what reasonably can be inferred when using some of these new 'scientific' risk instruments. In this article, we review some of the limitations of current measures used in sex offender risk assessments and discuss how these limitations place constraints on what can and should be communicated regarding results from these instruments. We conclude with a review of ethical concerns that arise from a failure to acknowledge the limitations of these measures.
Rights and Permissions
Citation: Amenta, A. E., Guy, L. S. & Edens, J. F. (2003). Sex offender risk assessment: A cautionary note regarding measures attempting to quantify violence risk. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 3, 39-50. DOI 10.1300/J158v03n01_04
Citation Information
Amy E. Amenta, Laura S. Guy and John F. Edens. "Sex Offender Risk Assessment: A Cautionary Note Regarding Measures Attempting to Quantify Violence Risk" Vol. 3 Iss. 1 (2003)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/laura_guy/11/