Skip to main content
Thoughts on film: Critically engaging with both Adorno and Bejamin
Educational Philosophy and Theory
  • Laura D'Olimpio, University of Notre Dame Australia
Year of Publication
There is a traditional debate in analytic aesthetics that surrounds the classification of film as Art. While much philosophy devoted to considering film has now moved beyond this debate and accepts film as a mass art, a sub-category of Art proper, it is worth re-considering the criticism of film pre-Deleuze. Much of the criticism of film as pseudo-art is expressed in moral terms. T. W. Adorno, for example, critiques film as ‘mass-cult’; mass produced culture which presents a ‘flattened’ version of reality. Adorno worries about the passivity encouraged in viewers. Films are narrative artworks, received by an audience in a context, making the focus on the reception of the work important. The dialogue held between Adorno and Walter Benjamin post-WWII is interesting because, between them, they consider both the possible positive emancipatory and negative politicization effects of film as a mass produced and distributed story-telling medium. Reading Adorno alongside Benjamin is a way to highlight the role of the critical thinker who receives the film. Arguing that the critical thinker is a valuable citizen, this paper focuses on the value of critical thinking in the reception of cinematic artworks. It achieves this by reconsidering Adorno and Benjamin's theories of mass art.
  • film theory,
  • aesthetics,
  • philosophy,
  • Adorno,
  • Benjamin,
  • critical thinking
Citation Information
Laura D'Olimpio. "Thoughts on film: Critically engaging with both Adorno and Bejamin" Educational Philosophy and Theory Vol. Published Online 8 October (2014) ISSN: 0013-1857
Available at: