Skip to main content
Unpublished Paper
The Doctrinal Toll of "Information as Speech"
ExpressO (2015)
  • Kyle Langvardt
Abstract
The courts over the past two decades have reached a near-consensus that computer code, along with virtually every flow of data on the Internet, is “speech” for First Amendment purposes. Today, newer information technologies such as 3D printing, synthetic biology, and digital currencies promise to remake whole other spheres of non-expressive economic activity in the Internet's image. The rush to claim First Amendment protections for these non-expressive but code-dependent technologies has already begun with a lawsuit claiming First Amendment privileges for the Internet distribution of 3D-printable guns. Many similar suits will surely follow, all pursuing the common dream of a future-shocked Lochner for a highly-informatized and thoroughly-deregulated economy. This Article argues that the theory of these lawsuits poses little genuine risk to the regulatory state. Instead, the threat is to the clarity and strength of core First Amendment principles. In theory, courts will test regulations of technologies such as digital currencies under the same strict standards that define mainstream First Amendment doctrine. But pragmatic concerns about the government's ability to regulate economic affairs will put pressure on the same courts to dilute those standards in practice. Over time, these diluted strains will find their way back to the mainstream of First Amendment litigation. The Article concludes with recommendations to mitigate the damage.
Keywords
  • First Amendment,
  • 3D Printing,
  • Synthetic Biology,
  • Digital Currencies
Publication Date
August 2, 2015
Citation Information
Kyle Langvardt. "The Doctrinal Toll of "Information as Speech"" ExpressO (2015)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/kyle_langvardt/4/