Skip to main content
Article
Juvenile bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) can be fed diets without marine fish meal without adverse effects on growth, survival, diet utilization, and body composition
Aquaculture Nutrition
  • Carl D. Webster, Harry K. Dupree Stuttgart National Aquaculture Research Center
  • Steven D. Rawles, Harry K. Dupree Stuttgart National Aquaculture Research Center
  • Anita M. Kelly, Auburn University
  • Luke A. Roy, Auburn University
  • Kurt A. Rosentrater, Iowa State University
Document Type
Article
Publication Version
Published Version
Publication Date
3-28-2021
DOI
10.1111/anu.13255
Abstract

There has been an increasing global demand for large bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) to supply the food‐fish market. Current bluegill diets resemble those for largemouth bass and contain a high percentage of marine fish meal (FM). Research into the use of alternative protein ingredients for bluegill diets need to be conducted to not only conserve finite marine resources, but to reduce cost and expand the supply of bluegill to the global market. We evaluated growth, survival and body composition of bluegill fed diets in which FM was partially or totally replaced by various combinations of soybean meal, poultry by‐product meal, canola meal, soy protein concentrate, wheat gluten or a commercial protein blend (Pro‐Cision™). Seven isonitrogenous (40% protein), isolipidic (11%) and isocaloric (17.1 kJ/g) diets were formulated to meet the known nutrient and energy requirements of largemouth bass and bluegill using centrarchid nutrient availability data for most of the dietary ingredients. One of the test diets consisted exclusively of plant protein sources. Juvenile bluegill (9.1 g initial weight) were reared in a recirculating aquaculture system (3 tanks/diet; 20 fish/tank) and fed the test diets once daily to satiation for 70‐day. The test diets in which various percentages of SBM, PBM and/or a commercial protein‐blended product (Pro‐Cision) which completely replaced FM resulted in similar growth performance, feed efficiency and body composition of juvenile bluegill compared to fish fed diets containing 30% FM. However, as formulated, the all‐plant diet resulted in reduced growth. Mean diet performance rankings based on response measures along with differences in essential nutrient and energy levels (i.e. amino acids, P and starch) provided some insight into subtle differences in performance among diets. It appears that bluegill can be fed fish meal‐free diets without reduced production (growth) if animal‐source protein ingredients (PBM or Pro‐Cision) are added; however, as formulated in this feeding trial, an all‐plant diet resulted in reduced growth. Further study on formulating all‐plant diets for bluegill is warranted.

Comments

This is the published version of the following article: Webster, Carl D., Steven D. Rawles, Anita M. Kelly, Luke A. Roy, and Kurt A. Rosentrater. "Juvenile bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) can be fed diets without marine fish meal without adverse effects on growth, survival, diet utilization, and body composition." Aquaculture Nutrition. DOI: 10.1111/anu.13255.

Access
Open
Rights
Works produced by employees of the U.S. Government as part of their official duties are not copyrighted within the U.S. The content of this document is not copyrighted.
Language
en
File Format
application/pdf
Citation Information
Carl D. Webster, Steven D. Rawles, Anita M. Kelly, Luke A. Roy, et al.. "Juvenile bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) can be fed diets without marine fish meal without adverse effects on growth, survival, diet utilization, and body composition" Aquaculture Nutrition (2021)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/kurt_rosentrater/358/