A randomised controlled trial comparing meat-based with human cadaveric models for teaching ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesiaAnaesthesia
Date of this Version8-1-2016
Document TypeJournal Article
AbstractThe aim of this prospective, blinded, randomised controlled study was to compare novices' acquisition of the technical skills of ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia using either a meat phantom model or fresh-frozen human cadavers. The primary outcome was the time taken to successfully perform an ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block on a cadaver; secondary outcomes were the cumulative score of errors, and best image quality of the sciatic nerve achieved. After training, the median (IQR [range]) time taken to perform the block was 311(164-390 [68-600]) s in the meat model trained group and 210 (174-354 [85-600]) s in the fresh-frozen cadaver trained group (p = 0.24). Participants made a median (IQR [range]) of 18 (14-33 [8-55]) and 15 (12-22 [8-44]) errors in the two groups respectively (p = 0.39). The image quality score was also not different, with a median (IQR [range]) of 62.5 (59.4-65.6 [25.0-100.0])% vs 62.5 (62.5-75.0 [25.0-87.5])% respectively (p = 0.58). The training and deliberate feedback improved all participants' block performance, the median (IQR [range]) times being 310 (206-532 [110-600]) s before and 240 (174-354 [85-600]) s after training (p = 0.02). We conclude that novices taught ultrasound scanning and needle guidance skills using an inexpensive and easily constructed meat model perform similarly to those trained on a cadaveric model.
Citation InformationA Chuan, Y C Lim, H Aneja, N A Duce, et al.. "A randomised controlled trial comparing meat-based with human cadaveric models for teaching ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia" Anaesthesia Vol. 71 Iss. 8 (2016) p. 921 - 929 ISSN: 1365-2044
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/kirsty-forrest/15/