Skip to main content
Article
Exploring the beliefs surrounding student evaluations of instruction in criminology and criminal justice undergraduate courses
Journal of Criminal Justice Education
  • Kim Michelle Lersch, University of South Florida
  • Cecil Greek, Florida State University
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2001
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250100086121
Abstract

Student evaluations of instructors are given consideration in a number of important decisions concerning instructors such as hiring, merit pay, and in the tenure and promotion process. However, a number of popular beliefs surround the interpretation of these evaluations. Using student evaluations for the three research-oriented universities in the state of Florida as a database, a number of these beliefs are explored. Specifically, the effects of instructor attributes (such as gender, rank and grades) and course characteristics (such as class size, type, number of course meetings, and time of day offered) on the end of the semester student evaluation rankings are discussed.

Citation / Publisher Attribution

Journal of Criminal Justice Education, v. 12, issue 2, p. 283-299

Citation Information
Kim Michelle Lersch and Cecil Greek. "Exploring the beliefs surrounding student evaluations of instruction in criminology and criminal justice undergraduate courses" Journal of Criminal Justice Education Vol. 12 Iss. 2 (2001) p. 283 - 299
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/kim-lersch/18/