Article
Workmen's Compensation - Evidence - Opinion of Non-Treating Psychiatrist Based on Claimant's Statements Held Inadmissible - Candella v. Subsequent Injury Fund
University of Baltimore Law Review
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-1-1976
Keywords
- workers' compensation law,
- evidence,
- labor law,
- employment law
Disciplines
Abstract
Discusses evidentiary requirements in Workers' Compensation cases and circuit court review of Workers' Compensation Commission decisions.
Citation Information
Kevin F. O'Neill. "Workmen's Compensation - Evidence - Opinion of Non-Treating Psychiatrist Based on Claimant's Statements Held Inadmissible - Candella v. Subsequent Injury Fund" University of Baltimore Law Review Vol. 6 Iss. 1 (1976) p. 165 - 180 Available at: http://works.bepress.com/kevin_oneill/36/