Diversity as a Dead-EndUF Law Faculty Publications
AbstractSupreme Court cases on diversity could only assist if they defined diversity in a way that allowed institutions to admit significant numbers of the type of individuals that the institutions were lacking. This is precisely what the Supreme Court's cases on diversity do not do. Furthermore, the Supreme Court's view of diversity is flawed because it does not address existing power differentials between Blacks and Whites. As a result diversity, as it is defined by the Supreme Court, is a dead-end for those who are concerned about social justice and equity in higher education.
Citation InformationKenneth B. Nunn, Diversity as a Dead-End, 35 Pepp. L. Rev. 705 (2008), available at http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/106