Qualitative and historiometric methods in leadership research: A review of the first 25 years of The Leadership QuarterlyThe Leadership Quarterly
Date of this Version1-1-2014
Document TypeJournal Article
AbstractIn the spirit of the 25th anniversary edition of The Leadership Quarterly, as the world's premier outlet for leadership research, we have reviewed qualitative and historiometric research across those 25 years. Qualitative research is a complex and cluttered area of scholarship. This is not because there is an inherent confusion about it. Rather, it is because ‘qualitative’ research is a cover-all term for a wide range of research strategies, paradigms, parent disciplines, sources of data, and methods of analysis for them. More so than in previous journal review articles, we explored variation in qualitative analysis as well as variety in qualitative data. In terms of methodologies, our efforts concentrated on case study, content analysis, grounded theory and historiometrics. We also examined trends toward post-positivism, post-modernity and liquid modernity, and their resultant benefits for researching leadership. Future directions for leadership research are posited.
Citation InformationKen Parry, Michael D. Mumford, Ian M. Bower and Logan L. Watts. "Qualitative and historiometric methods in leadership research: A review of the first 25 years of The Leadership Quarterly" The Leadership Quarterly Vol. 25 Iss. 1 (2014) p. 132 - 151 ISSN: 1048-9843
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/ken_parry/34/