Skip to main content
Article
Smoke and mirrors: unanswered questions and misleading statements obscure the truth about organ sources in China
Journal of Medical Ethics
  • Wendy A Rogers, Macquarie University
  • Torsten Tray, Doctors Against Forced Organ Harvesting, Washington DC, USA
  • Maria A Fiatarone Singh, The University of Sydney
  • Madeleine Bridgett
  • Katrina A. Bramstedt, Bond University
  • Jacob Lavee, Tel Aviv University
Date of this Version
5-4-2016
Document Type
Response or Comment
Publication Details

Citation only

Rogers, W. A., Tray, T., Fiatarone Singh, M. A., Bridgett, M., Bramstedt, K., & Lavee, J. (2016, in press). Smoke and mirrors: unanswered questions and misleading statements obscure the truth about organ sources in China. Journal of Medical Ethics.

Access the journal

Copyright © 2016 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.

Abstract

This response refutes the claim made in a recent article that organs for transplantation in China will no longer be sourced from executed prisoners. We identify ongoing ethical problems due to the lack of transparent data on current numbers of transplants in China; implausible and conflicting claims about voluntary donations; and obfuscation about who counts as a voluntary donor. The big unanswered question in Chinese transplant ethics is the source of organs, and until there is an open and independently audited system in China, legitimate concerns remain about organ harvesting from prisoners of conscience.

Citation Information
Wendy A Rogers, Torsten Tray, Maria A Fiatarone Singh, Madeleine Bridgett, et al.. "Smoke and mirrors: unanswered questions and misleading statements obscure the truth about organ sources in China" Journal of Medical Ethics (2016) ISSN: 0306-6800
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/katrina_bramstedt/51/