Skip to main content
Article
Family refusals of registered consents: The disruption of organ donation by double-standard surrogate decision-making
Internal Medicine Journal
  • Katrina A. Bramstedt, Bond University
Date of this Version
1-1-2013
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Details

Citation only

Bramstedt, K. (2013). Family refusals of registered consents: The disruption of organ donation by double-standard surrogate decision-making. Internal Medicine Journal, 43(2), 120-123

Access the journal

2013 HERDC submission. FoR code: 220106

© Copyright, The Author: Royal Australasian College of Physicians, 2013

Abstract

Some countries such as Australia, Spain, Norway, Italy and Canada allow next of kin to override the consent of registered organ donor candidates if they personally do not concur with the donation desire of their relative. This form of surrogate decision-making represents a double standard in terms of the principle of substituted judgment (the surrogate’s duty). Further, double-standard surrogate decision-making in the setting of organ donation is a slippery slope to unethical surrogate decision-making while patients are alive. Concerns about family distress and donor candidate revocation of consent can still be managed without permitting double-standard surrogate decision-making

Citation Information
Katrina A. Bramstedt. "Family refusals of registered consents: The disruption of organ donation by double-standard surrogate decision-making" Internal Medicine Journal (2013) ISSN: 1444-0903
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/katrina_bramstedt/30/