Skip to main content
Article
Institutional and Stakeholder Effects on Carbon Mitigation Strategies
WCBT Faculty Publications
  • Kathy K. Dhanda, Sacred Heart University
  • Joseph Sarkis
  • Dileep G. Dhavale
Document Type
Peer-Reviewed Article
Publication Date
3-1-2022
Abstract

The latest IPCC report foreshadows a far gloomier picture of climate change consequences than previously held by demonstrating how avoiding environmental damage requires transforming the world economy at a speed and scale that has “no documented historic precedent.” One of the options to address climate change is adoption of mitigation strategies to reduce carbon emissions on national, sectoral, and corporate levels. This research analyzes mitigation responses by organizations facing institutional and stakeholder pressures while dealing with the risk and opportunities presented by climate change. Our research indicates that different types of institutional pressures—coercive, normative, and mimetic—lead to different and, in certain situations, more active responses from companies. We find that coercive pressures are about equal or more effective than normative or mimetic pressures for adoption of mitigation strategies.

Comments

First published: 02 November 2021.

DOI
10.1002/bse.2917
Citation Information

Dhanda, K. K., Sarkis, J., & Dhavale, D. G. (2022). Institutional and stakeholder effects on carbon mitigation strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 782-795. Doi: 10.1002/bse.2917