Skip to main content
Article
Standards-as-Barriers versus Standards-as-Catalysts:Assessing the Impact of HACCP Implementation on U.S. Seafood Imports
American Journal of Agricultural Economics (2009)
  • Julie Caswell, University of Massachusetts - Amherst
Abstract

The United States mandated a Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) food safety standard for seafood in 1997. Panel model results for 1990 to 2004 suggest that HACCP introduction had a negative and significant impact on overall imports from the top thirty-three suppliers. While the effect for developed countries was positive, the negative effect for developing countries supports the view of "standards as barriers" versus "standards as catalysts." A different perspective emerges from individual country-level analysis. Regardless of development status, leading seafood exporters generally experienced a positive HACCP effect, while most other smaller trading partners faced a negative effect. Copyright Copyright 2009 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

Disciplines
Publication Date
2009
Citation Information
Julie Caswell. "Standards-as-Barriers versus Standards-as-Catalysts:Assessing the Impact of HACCP Implementation on U.S. Seafood Imports" American Journal of Agricultural Economics Vol. 91 Iss. 2 (2009)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/julie_caswell/2/