Skip to main content
Retail investors exonerated: The case of the January effect
Accounting & Finance
  • Julia Henker, Bond University
  • Debapriya J. Paul, University of New South Wales
Date of this Version
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Details

Citation only

Henker, J., & Paul, D.J. (2012). Retail investors exonerated: The case of the January effect. Accounting and Finance, 52 (4), 1083-1099.

Access the journal's website.

© Copyright The Authors, 2011
© Copyright AFAANZ, 2011

We dispel the belief that the January effect is due to retail investor trading. Previous studies suggest that retail investors, affected by behavioural biases and disproportionally invested in small capitalization stocks, are the source of the January effect. Furthermore, the literature regards retail investor trading and the tax-loss selling hypothesis as essentially the same explanation. We separate tax implications and market capitalization to show that retail traders are not the cause of the January effect. Our study is an important direct test of whether retail trading causes market anomalies.
Citation Information
Julia Henker and Debapriya J. Paul. "Retail investors exonerated: The case of the January effect" Accounting & Finance Vol. 52 Iss. 4 (2012) p. 1083 - 1099 ISSN: 0810-5391
Available at: