Article
Law Without Mind: AI, Ethics, and Jurisprudence
Working Paper
(2018)
Abstract
Anything we can conceive that computers may do, it seems that they end up doing and that they end up doing it better than us and much sooner than we expected. They have gone from calculating mathematics for us to creating and maintaining our social networks to serving as our personal assistants. We are told they may soon become our friends and make life and death decisions driving our cars. Perhaps they will also take over interpreting our laws. It is not that hard to conceive of computers doing so to the extent legal interpretation involves mere description or prediction. It is much harder to conceive of computers making substantive moral judgments. So the ultimate bulwark against ceding legal interpretation to computers—from having computers usurp the responsibility and authority of attorneys, citizens, and even judges—may be to recognize the role of moral judgment in saying what the law is. That possibility connects the cutting edge with the traditional. The central dispute in jurisprudence for the past half century or more has been about the role of morality in legal interpretation. Suddenly, that dispute has great currency and urgency. Jurisprudence may help us to clarify and circumscribe the role of computers in our legal system. And contemplating AI may help us to resolve jurisprudential debates that have vexed us for decades.
Keywords
- artificial intelligence,
- AI,
- jurisprudence,
- computers,
- legal interpretation,
- moral judgment,
- law
Disciplines
Publication Date
May, 2018
Citation Information
Joshua P. Davis. "Law Without Mind: AI, Ethics, and Jurisprudence" Working Paper (2018) Available at: http://works.bepress.com/joshua_davis/18/