Article
Immigrant threat and national salience: Understanding the “English official” movement in the United States
Research & Politics
(2014)
Abstract
The passage of (and debate over) immigration laws in Arizona highlights the increasing linguistic diversity of the US. To date, 31 states have passed an English-official bill. In this paper, we test several hypotheses concerning the adoption of such legislation across the states. Using data spanning the past three decades, we present event history models on the timing of adoption since the start of the modern movement in 1980. Like previous works, we find that the timing of adoption in states is structured by immigrant population and the initiative process. However, we find a conditional story that has been overlooked to date: the effects of immigrant threat only increase the likelihood of English-official legislation adoption when the issue of immigration is nationally salient
Keywords
- Language,
- immigration,
- state politics
Disciplines
Publication Date
April 1, 2014
DOI
10.1177/2053168014531926
Publisher Statement
Copyright and Open Access: http://sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/2053-1680/
Citation Information
Amy Liu, Anand Sokhey, Joshua Kennedy and Annie Miller. "Immigrant threat and national salience: Understanding the “English official” movement in the United States" Research & Politics Vol. 1 Iss. 1 (2014) ISSN: 2053-1680 Available at: http://works.bepress.com/joshua-kennedy/1/