"Review of Combat Identification Training: Technologies, Metrics, and Individual Differences" by Joseph R. Keebler

Presentation

Review of Combat Identification Training: Technologies, Metrics, and Individual Differences

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 59th Annual Meeting (2015)

Joseph R. Keebler, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
Dustin C. Smith, Witchita State Unviersity
Brady Patzer, Wichita State University
John P. Plummer, Wichita State University
Florian Jentsch, University of Central Florida
Evan Palmer, Wichita State University

Abstract

Combat identification (CID) has been studied throughout the 20th and into the 21st century, with a renewed interest in the topic in the past few decades. CID research has demonstrated that an emerging set of technologies could potentially mitigate some of the negative battlefield outcomes of failures in CID, including high rates of fratricide due to friendly fire. This paper discusses major CID research and provides an update on previous CID research by the authors. We review training technologies, effective measurement tools in this research, and important individual differences to consider for others researching training outcomes in relation to learning to differentiate between highly similar combat vehicles.

Keywords

training

Disciplines

Other Psychology

Publication Date

2015

Location

Los Angeles, CA

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931215591392

Citation Information

Joseph R. Keebler, Dustin C. Smith, Brady Patzer, John P. Plummer, et al.. "Review of Combat Identification Training: Technologies, Metrics, and Individual Differences" Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 59th Annual Meeting (2015)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/joseph_r_keebler/95/