Skip to main content
Article
Working Memory’s Workload Capacity
Memory and Cognition (2015)
  • Andrew Heathcote
  • James R. Coleman, University of Utah
  • Ami Eidels
  • Jason M. Watson, University of Utah
  • Joseph W. Houpt, Wright State University - Main Campus
  • David L. Strayer, University of Utah
Abstract
We examined the role of dual-task interference in working memory using a novel dual 2-back task that requires a redundant-target response (i.e., that neither the auditory nor visual stimulus occurred two back vs. one or both occurred two back) on every trial. Comparisons with performance on single 2 back trials (i.e., with only auditory or only visual stimuli) showed dual-task demands reduced both speed and accuracy. Our task design enabled a novel application of Townsend and Nozawa’s (1995) workload capacity measure, which revealed that the decrement in dual 2-back performance was mediated by sharing of a limited amount of processing capacity. Relative to most other single and dual n-back tasks, performance measures for our task were more reliable, due to the use of a small stimulus set that induced a high and constant level of proactive interference. For a version of our dual 2-back task that minimized response bias, accuracy was also more strongly correlated with a complex span than has been found for most other single and dual n-back tasks.
Publication Date
2015
Publisher Statement
Available for download is the author's accepted manuscript of this article. The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0526-2.
Citation Information
Andrew Heathcote, James R. Coleman, Ami Eidels, Jason M. Watson, et al.. "Working Memory’s Workload Capacity" Memory and Cognition (2015)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/joseph_houpt/40/