Skip to main content
Article
Outcomes and Charges Associated with Outpatient Inguinal Hernia Repair According to Method of Anesthesia and Surgical Approach
The American Journal of Surgery
  • Adam L. Bourgon, Wright State University
  • Justin P. Fox, Wright State University
  • Jonathan M. Saxe, Wright State University
  • Randy J. Woods, Wright State University
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-1-2015
Abstract

Background

We conducted this study to compare short-term outcomes and charges between methods of hernia repair and anesthesia in the outpatient setting. Methods

Using New York's state ambulatory surgery databases, we identified discharges for patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair. Patients were grouped by method of hernia repair. We compared hospital-based acute care encounters and total charges across groups. Results

Locoregional anesthesia (5.2%) experienced a similar frequency of hospital-based acute care encounters within 30 days of discharge when compared with patients receiving general (6.0%) or having a laparoscopic procedure (6.0%). Risk-adjusted charges increased across groups (locoregional = $6,845 vs general = $7,839 vs laparoscopic = $11,340, P < .01). Conclusion

Open inguinal hernia repair under local anesthesia reduces healthcare charges.

DOI
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.09.021
Citation Information
Adam L. Bourgon, Justin P. Fox, Jonathan M. Saxe and Randy J. Woods. "Outcomes and Charges Associated with Outpatient Inguinal Hernia Repair According to Method of Anesthesia and Surgical Approach" The American Journal of Surgery Vol. 209 Iss. 3 (2015) p. 468 - 472 ISSN: 00029610
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jonathan_saxe/58/