Skip to main content
Martin v. Malcolm: Democracy, Nonviolence, Manhood
West Virginia Law Review (2012)
  • John M Kang, St. Thomas University School of Law

It seemed almost scripted, how Martin Luther King and Malcolm X existed at the same time and perfectly symbolized, respectively, the arguments for peaceful resistance and violent struggle as means for political change.

King had urged his followers to bestow Christian love on white racists who abused them. Malcolm memorably asserted that blacks should seek any means necessary to achieve justice.

By sifting through their words, we may gain a better idea about why someone would choose nonviolence over violence (or vice versa). Through them, we also may understand better how personal life experiences, rather than formal study in ethics or philosophy, are responsible for shaping a person’s conception of democracy. Specifically, I suggest that King’s and Malcolm’s familial upbringing and economic circumstances profoundly shaped their worldviews and political proscriptions. My purpose for venturing into their personal lives is not to indulge a bleak voyeurism but to outline which types of individuals might be drawn to which kinds of arguments for democratic change.

  • Martin Luther King,
  • Malcolm X,
  • political violence,
  • nonviolence,
  • civil disobedience,
  • revolution,
  • manhood
Publication Date
Citation Information
John M Kang. "Martin v. Malcolm: Democracy, Nonviolence, Manhood" West Virginia Law Review Vol. 114 (2012)
Available at: