Skip to main content
Article
Varying the item format improved the range of measurement in patient-reported outcome measures assessing physical function
University of Massachusetts Medical School Faculty Publications
  • Gregor Liegl, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • Barbara L. Gandek, University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • H. Felix Fischer, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • Jakob B. Bjorner, University of Copenhagen
  • John E. Ware, Jr., University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • Matthias S. F. Rose, University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • James F. Fries, Stanford University School of Medicine
  • Sandra Nolte, Deakin University
UMMS Affiliation
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences
Publication Date
3-21-2017
Document Type
Article
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physical function (PF) is a core patient-reported outcome domain in clinical trials in rheumatic diseases. Frequently used PF measures have ceiling effects, leading to large sample size requirements and low sensitivity to change. In most of these instruments, the response category that indicates the highest PF level is the statement that one is able to perform a given physical activity without any limitations or difficulty. This study investigates whether using an item format with an extended response scale, allowing respondents to state that the performance of an activity is easy or very easy, increases the range of precise measurement of self-reported PF. METHODS: Three five-item PF short forms were constructed from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(R)) wave 1 data. All forms included the same physical activities but varied in item stem and response scale: format A ("Are you able to ..."; "without any difficulty"/"unable to do"); format B ("Does your health now limit you ..."; "not at all"/"cannot do"); format C ("How difficult is it for you to ..."; "very easy"/"impossible"). Each short-form item was answered by 2217-2835 subjects. We evaluated unidimensionality and estimated a graded response model for the 15 short-form items and remaining 119 items of the PROMIS PF bank to compare item and test information for the short forms along the PF continuum. We then used simulated data for five groups with different PF levels to illustrate differences in scoring precision between the short forms using different item formats. RESULTS: Sufficient unidimensionality of all short-form items and the original PF item bank was supported. Compared to formats A and B, format C increased the range of reliable measurement by about 0.5 standard deviations on the positive side of the PF continuum of the sample, provided more item information, and was more useful in distinguishing known groups with above-average functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Using an item format with an extended response scale is an efficient option to increase the measurement range of self-reported physical function without changing the content of the measure or affecting the latent construct of the instrument.
Keywords
  • Ceiling effects,
  • Item format,
  • Item information,
  • Item-response theory,
  • Measurement range,
  • Patient-reported outcomes,
  • Physical function,
  • Response scale
Rights and Permissions
© The Author(s). 2017. Citation: Arthritis Res Ther. 2017 Mar 21;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1273-5. Link to article on publisher's site
Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMed
PubMed ID
28320462
Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Citation Information
Gregor Liegl, Barbara L. Gandek, H. Felix Fischer, Jakob B. Bjorner, et al.. "Varying the item format improved the range of measurement in patient-reported outcome measures assessing physical function" Vol. 19 Iss. 1 (2017) ISSN: 1478-6354 (Linking)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/john_ware/225/