Contribution to Book
Negotiating about power sharing and how to make decisions in the futureLaw Faculty Publications
Date of this Version1-1-2015
Document TypeBook Chapter
AbstractThis chapter will set out a “gradation” of legal decision-making power ranging from total to zero. Such a gradation provides a useful template and a form of “expert power” for any negotiator. Founding fathers and mothers of clubs, churches, organizations and nations are particularly adept at negotiating balances of power in the form of “constitutions”. The founders usually negotiate with passion and persistence as they have experienced absolute power corrupting absolutely. Power sharing deals also commonly include power over budget spending; relocating children; appointing judges; hiring and firing employees; implementing medical research, prisoner release and military invasions1. Negotiations about decision-making power raise a challenge. What is the predictable “range” of non-numerical offers, counter offers and solutions from total to zero legal power? Generic negotiation agenda questions about power often take forms such as: How will future decisions be made about the following different topics----(expenditure, medical care, armament restrictions, holidays etc)? Or, who will have the power to make future decisions about----? What conditions, if any, should be followed before or after each type of decision is made?
Citation InformationJohn Wade. "Negotiating about power sharing and how to make decisions in the future" (2015) p. 1 - 13
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/john_wade/72/