Skip to main content
Article
Split-thickness Skin Grafts for Closure of Diabetic Foot and Ankle Wounds: A Retrospective Review of 83 Patients.
Foot & Ankle Specialist
  • Crystal L Ramanujam, University of Texas Health Science - San Antonio
  • John J Stapleton, DPM, FACFAS, Lehigh Valley Health Network
  • Krista L Kilpadi
  • Roberto H Rodriguez
  • Luke C Jeffries
  • Thomas Zgonis
Publication/Presentation Date
10-1-2010
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine if split-thickness skin grafts could be successfully used for closure of foot and ankle wounds in diabetic patients. The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts of 100 consecutive patients who underwent a soft tissue surgical reconstruction with split-thickness skin grafts to their foot and/or ankle in our institution from 2005 to 2008. After application of inclusion criteria, 83 eligible charts remained. Of the 83 patients, 54 (65%) healed uneventfully, 23 (28%) required regrafting, and 6 (7%) had a complication resolved with conservative management. All patients had a successful surgical outcome, defined as having achieved complete wound closure at the final follow-up. Surgical outcome was not significantly associated with age, gender, race, hemoglobin A1C, wound size, wound location, illicit drug use, amputation history, Charcot history, or preoperative infection. However, postoperative graft complications were significantly associated with current or previous smoking history (P = .016) and the level of previous pedal amputation to which the split-thickness skin graft was applied (P = .009). This study demonstrates that application of split-thickness skin grafts with an appropriate postoperative regimen is a beneficial procedure to achieve foot and ankle wound closure in diabetic patients.
PubMedID
20631059
Document Type
Article
Citation Information

Ramanujam, C. L., Stapleton, J. J., Kilpadi, K. L., Rodriguez, R. H., Jeffries, L. C., & Zgonis, T. (2010). Split-thickness skin grafts for closure of diabetic foot and ankle wounds: a retrospective review of 83 patients. Foot & Ankle Specialist, 3(5), 231-240. doi:10.1177/1938640010375114