Skip to main content
Article
#DitchTheSurvey: Expanding Methodological Diversity in LIS Research
In the Library with the Lead Pipe (2015)
  • Rebecca Halpern
  • Christopher Eaker
  • Daina Bouquin
  • John M Jackson, Loyola Marymount University
Abstract
Recent content analyses of LIS literature show that, by far, the most popular data collection method employed by librarians and library researchers is the survey. The authors of this article, all participants in the 2014 Institute for Research Design in Librarianship, recognize that there are sound reasons for using a survey. However, like any one method, its very nature limits the types of questions we can ask. Our profession’s excessive reliance on the survey likewise imposes excessive limitations on what we can know about our field and our users. This article summarizes recent studies of the methods most common to LIS studies, explores more deeply the benefits of using non-survey methods, and offers recommendations for future researchers. In short, this article is a call to arms: it is time to ditch the survey as our primary research method and think outside the checkbox. It is time to fully embrace evidence-based library and information practice and promote training in diverse research techniques.
Keywords
  • methodologies,
  • surveys,
  • vignettes,
  • qualitative methods
Publication Date
March 10, 2015
Citation Information
Rebecca Halpern, Christopher Eaker, Daina Bouquin and John M Jackson. "#DitchTheSurvey: Expanding Methodological Diversity in LIS Research" In the Library with the Lead Pipe (2015) ISSN: 1944-6195
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/john_jackson/2/
Creative Commons license
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons CC_BY International License.