Skip to main content
Presentation
Ambiguity and Content Mapping among Display Types
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
  • Jerred C. Holt, Wright State University - Main Campus
  • Kevin B. Bennett, Wright State University - Main Campus
  • John M. Flach, Wright State University - Main Campus
Document Type
Conference Proceeding
Publication Date
9-1-2011
Catalog Record
Catalog Record
Abstract

The present study examines the efficacy of four display types. We tested digital, bar graph, polar graphic (Coury, Boulette, & Smith, 1989) and a coordinate display type. Participants completed a state classification task as described by Coury et al. Results indicate a clear performance difference among displays. The coordinate display showed significantly higher response accuracy and lower response times. The polar graphic display performed the poorest on both outcomes. Bar and digital displays demonstrated approximately equivalent performance. These results lend further support to the importance of ecological interface design and are consistent with the principles of semantic mapping. Directions for further study are discussed.

Comments

Presented at the 55th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Las Vegas, NV, September 19-23, 2011.

DOI
10.1177/1071181311551080
Citation Information
Jerred C. Holt, Kevin B. Bennett and John M. Flach. "Ambiguity and Content Mapping among Display Types" Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Vol. 55 Iss. 1 (2011) p. 390 - 393 ISSN: 9780945289395
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/john_flach/154/