Skip to main content
Planning Framework Options for The Massachusetts Ocean Plan (DRAFT)
Urban Harbors Institute Publications
  • Jack Wiggin, University of Massachusetts Boston
  • Kristin Uiterwyk, University of Massachusetts Boston
  • Steve Bliven, University of Massachusetts Boston
  • Dan Hellin, University of Massachusetts Boston
  • John Duff, University of Massachusetts Boston
  • David Terkla, University of Massachusetts Boston
  • Robert E. Bowen, University of Massachusetts Boston
  • Andrew A. Rosenberg, MRAG Americas, Inc.
  • Jennie Harrington, MRAG Americas, Inc.
  • Jill H. Swasey, MRAG Americas, Inc.
  • Suzanne Iudicello, MRAG Americas, Inc.
  • Robert O’Boyle, MRAG Americas, Inc.
  • Porter Hoagland, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Marine Policy Center
  • Hauke L. Kite-Powell, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Marine Policy Center
  • Di Jin, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Marine Policy Center
  • Fara Courtney, Good Harbor Consulting
  • Rich Delaney, Provincetown Center for Coastal Studies
  • Pat Hughes, Provincetown Center for Coastal Studies
  • Tracey Morin Dalton, University of Rhode Island
  • Suzanne Goulet Orenstein
  • Charles N. Ehler, Ocean Visions
  • Fannie Douvere, Ocean Visions
  • Les Kaufman, Boston University
  • Charles T. McCaffrey, Jr.
  • Nicholas Napoli, Massachusetts Ocean Partnership
  • Stephanie Moura, Massachusetts Ocean Partnership
  • Kim Starbuck, Massachusetts Ocean Partnership
Document Type
Research Report
Publication Date
The Massachusetts Ocean Partnership (MOP) Planning Frameworks Team, in consultation with the Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EEA), and based on collective experience and a review of ocean, coastal and resource management programs from the US and other countries, suggests that nine elements are essential components of the framework for the Massachusetts Ocean Plan and its implementation. While management plans and programs generally have these elements in common, there are a range of options for carrying out each program component. These options were presented to structure and inform the development of the Massachusetts Ocean Plan. For the most part, the range of options represents those that were considered to be appropriate under the Commonwealth’s existing legal and administrative structure and responsive to the requirements of the Massachusetts Ocean Act. However, the general concepts these options represent are likely to be transferable to other jurisdictions (especially in the United States) and can inform future ocean management and planning in Massachusetts. Additionally, options or their core elements can be combined to create additional alternatives within one of the nine planning components.

DRAFT prepared by the UMass Boston Planning Frameworks Team and the Massachusetts Ocean Partnership.

Community Engaged/Serving
No, this is not community-engaged.
Citation Information
Jack Wiggin, Kristin Uiterwyk, Steve Bliven, Dan Hellin, et al.. "Planning Framework Options for The Massachusetts Ocean Plan (DRAFT)" (2009)
Available at: